首页> 外文OA文献 >Clarifications regarding the use of model-fitting methods of kinetic analysis for determining the activation energy from a single non-isothermal curve
【2h】

Clarifications regarding the use of model-fitting methods of kinetic analysis for determining the activation energy from a single non-isothermal curve

机译:关于使用动力学分析模型拟合方法从单个非等温曲线确定活化能的澄清

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background This paper provides some clarifications regarding the use of model-fitting methods of kinetic analysis for estimating the activation energy of a process, in response to some results recently published in Chemistry Central journal. Findings The model fitting methods of Arrhenius and Savata are used to determine the activation energy of a single simulated curve. It is shown that most kinetic models correctly fit the data, each providing a different value for the activation energy. Therefore it is not really possible to determine the correct activation energy from a single non-isothermal curve. On the other hand, when a set of curves are recorded under different heating schedules are used, the correct kinetic parameters can be clearly discerned. Conclusions Here, it is shown that the activation energy and the kinetic model cannot be unambiguously determined from a single experimental curve recorded under non isothermal conditions. Thus, the use of a set of curves recorded under different heating schedules is mandatory if model-fitting methods are employed.
机译:摘要背景本文针对最近发表在《化学中央》杂志上的一些结果,对动力学分析的模型拟合方法用于估算过程的活化能提供了一些说明。结果使用Arrhenius和Savata的模型拟合方法确定单个模拟曲线的激活能。结果表明,大多数动力学模型正确拟合了数据,每个模型都提供了不同的活化能值。因此,实际上不可能从单个非等温曲线确定正确的活化能。另一方面,当使用不同加热时间表记录一组曲线时,可以清楚地识别出正确的动力学参数。结论在此表明,不能从非等温条件下记录的一条实验曲线中明确确定活化能和动力学模型。因此,如果采用模型拟合方法,则必须使用在不同加热时间表下记录的一组曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号